GLM 4.7 has shown strong performance in coding tasks such as refactoring, debugging, and code review, particularly excelling in Python backend work by maintaining context and catching logic issues. It compares favorably to Deepseek v3 by slightly better maintaining context in long conversations, though it struggles with complex algorithmic tasks. In comparison to Qwen2.5-coder, GLM is more consistent in maintaining conversation flow, while being less verbose than Kimi. Although it struggles with complex React state management and architectural decisions, its open-source nature and cost-effectiveness make it a viable option for developers focused on implementation tasks. This matters because choosing the right coding model can significantly impact productivity and cost efficiency in software development workflows.
