human cognition
-
The False Promise of ChatGPT
Read Full Article: The False Promise of ChatGPT
Advancements in artificial intelligence, particularly machine learning models like ChatGPT, have sparked both optimism and concern. While these models are adept at processing vast amounts of data to generate humanlike language, they fundamentally differ from human cognition, which efficiently creates explanations and uses language with finite means for infinite expression. The reliance on pattern matching in AI poses risks, as these systems struggle to balance creativity with ethical constraints, often resulting in either overgeneration or undergeneration of content. Despite their potential utility in specific domains, the limitations and potential harms of these AI systems highlight the need for caution in their development and application. This matters because understanding the limitations and ethical challenges of AI is crucial for responsible development and integration into society.
-
Reevaluating LLMs: Prediction vs. Reasoning
Read Full Article: Reevaluating LLMs: Prediction vs. Reasoning
The argument that large language models (LLMs) merely predict the next token in a sequence without engaging in real reasoning is challenged by questioning if human cognition might operate in a similar manner. The focus should not be on the method of next-token prediction itself, but rather on the complexity and structure of the internal processes that drive it. If the system behind token selection is sophisticated enough, it could be considered a form of reasoning. The debate highlights the need to reconsider what constitutes intelligence and reasoning, suggesting that the internal processes are more crucial than the sequential output of tokens. This matters because it challenges our understanding of both artificial intelligence and human cognition, potentially reshaping how we define intelligence.