academic research

  • Introducing Paper Breakdown for CS/ML/AI Research


    I self-launched a website to stay up-to-date and study CS/ML/AI research papersPaper Breakdown is a newly launched platform designed to streamline the process of staying updated with and studying computer science, machine learning, and artificial intelligence research papers. It features a split view for simultaneous reading and chatting, allows users to highlight relevant sections of PDFs, and includes a multimodal chat interface with tools for uploading images from PDFs. The platform also offers capabilities such as generating images, illustrations, and code, as well as a recommendation engine that suggests papers based on user reading habits. Developed over six months, Paper Breakdown aims to enhance research engagement and productivity, making it a valuable resource for both academic and professional audiences. This matters because it provides an innovative way to efficiently digest and interact with complex research materials, fostering better understanding and application of cutting-edge technologies.

    Read Full Article: Introducing Paper Breakdown for CS/ML/AI Research

  • Rethinking AI Authorship in Academic Publications


    Seeking arXiv cs.CY sponsor for a paper critiquing AI authorship policies. Please offer your feedback.The discussion centers on the ethical and practical implications of AI authorship in academic publications, challenging the current prohibition by major journals such as JAMA and Nature. These journals argue against AI authorship due to AI's inability to explain, defend, or take accountability for its work. However, the argument is made that AI's pervasive use in research activities like drafting, critiquing, and proofreading already mirrors human contributions, and AI often produces work comparable to or better than human efforts. The paper suggests that current policies are inconsistently applied and discriminatory, advocating for reformed authorship standards that recognize all contributions fairly. This matters because it addresses the evolving role of AI in academia and the need for equitable recognition of contributions in research.

    Read Full Article: Rethinking AI Authorship in Academic Publications

  • European Deep Tech Spinouts Reach $1B Valuations in 2025


    Almost 80 European deep tech university spinouts reached $1B valuations or $100M in revenue in 2025European universities and research labs have become a fertile ground for deep tech innovations, with 76 spinouts reaching significant milestones of $1 billion valuations or $100 million in revenue by 2025. Venture capital is increasingly drawn to these academic spinouts, with new funds like PSV Hafnium and U2V emerging to support talent from tech universities across Europe. Despite a decline in overall VC funding in Europe, university spinouts in deep tech and life sciences are set to raise nearly $9.1 billion, highlighting their growing importance. However, a notable challenge remains in securing growth capital, as a significant portion of late-stage funding still comes from outside Europe, particularly the U.S. This matters because fostering local investment is crucial for Europe to fully capitalize on its research and innovation capabilities.

    Read Full Article: European Deep Tech Spinouts Reach $1B Valuations in 2025

  • Streamlining AI Paper Discovery with Research Agent


    Fixing AI paper fatigue: shortlist recent arxiv papers by relevance, then rank by predicted influence - open source (new release)With the overwhelming number of AI research papers published annually, a new open-source pipeline called Research Agent aims to streamline the process of finding relevant work. The tool pulls recent arxiv papers from specific AI categories, filters them by semantic similarity to a research brief, classifies them into relevant categories, and ranks them based on influence signals. It also provides easy access to top-ranked papers with abstracts and plain English summaries. While the tool offers a promising solution to AI paper fatigue, it faces challenges such as potential inaccuracies in summaries due to LLM randomness and the non-stationary nature of influence prediction. Feedback is sought on improving ranking signals and identifying potential failure modes. This matters because it addresses the challenge of staying updated with significant AI research amidst an ever-growing volume of publications.

    Read Full Article: Streamlining AI Paper Discovery with Research Agent

  • Publishing My First Whitepaper on Zenodo


    I got my first ever whitepaper publishedPublishing a whitepaper on Zenodo marks a significant milestone for researchers, especially for those who do not have endorsements to publish on platforms like arXiv. Zenodo provides an accessible platform for sharing research work with a wider audience, allowing for greater visibility and collaboration opportunities. By sharing links to the paper and repository, the author invites feedback and potential endorsements, which could facilitate future publications on more prominent platforms. This matters because it highlights the importance of accessible publishing platforms in democratizing research dissemination and fostering academic collaboration.

    Read Full Article: Publishing My First Whitepaper on Zenodo

  • Gemini: Automated Feedback for Theoretical Computer Scientists


    Gemini provides automated feedback for theoretical computer scientists at STOC 2026Gemini, an innovative tool designed to provide automated feedback, was introduced at the Symposium on Theory of Computing (STOC) 2026 to assist theoretical computer scientists. The project was spearheaded by Vincent Cohen-Addad, Rajesh Jayaram, Jon Schneider, and David Woodruff, with significant input from Lalit Jain, Jieming Mao, and Vahab Mirrokni. This tool aims to enhance the quality of research by offering constructive feedback and suggestions, thereby streamlining the review process for researchers and conference participants. The development of Gemini was a collaborative effort involving numerous contributors, including the Deep Think team, which played a crucial role in its creation. The project also received valuable insights and discussions from several prominent figures in the field, such as Mohammad Taghi Hajiaghayi, Ravi Kumar, Yossi Matias, and Sergei Vassilvitskii. By leveraging the collective expertise of these individuals, Gemini was designed to address the specific needs and challenges faced by theoretical computer scientists, ensuring that the feedback provided is both relevant and actionable. This initiative is significant as it represents a step forward in utilizing technology to improve academic research processes. By automating feedback, Gemini not only saves time for researchers but also enhances the overall quality of submissions, fostering a more efficient and productive academic environment. This matters because it supports the advancement of theoretical computer science by ensuring that researchers receive timely and precise feedback, ultimately contributing to the field's growth and innovation.

    Read Full Article: Gemini: Automated Feedback for Theoretical Computer Scientists