AI as a System of Record: Governance Challenges

Enterprise AI is increasingly being used not just for assistance but as a system of record, with outputs being incorporated into reports, decisions, and customer communications. This shift emphasizes the need for robust governance and evidentiary controls, as accuracy alone is insufficient when accountability is required. As AI systems become more autonomous, organizations face greater liability unless they can provide clear audit trails and reconstruct the actions and claims of their AI models. The challenge lies in the asymmetry between forward-looking model design and backward-looking governance, necessitating a focus on evidence rather than just explainability. This matters because without proper governance, organizations risk internal control weaknesses and potential regulatory scrutiny.

AI systems are increasingly being integrated into enterprise operations, not just as assistive tools but as integral components whose outputs are being used as official records. This shift is significant because it transforms AI outputs from mere suggestions to authoritative sources that influence decisions and actions. As these outputs are copied into reports, cited in decision-making processes, and forwarded to customers, they effectively become part of the organization’s record-keeping system. This transformation raises important questions about accountability and governance, as organizations must now consider how to track and verify the actions and decisions made based on AI-generated data.

Accuracy alone is no longer sufficient to defend the use of AI in critical applications. While high benchmark performance might indicate that an AI system is functioning well, it does not address the need for transparency and accountability. When auditors, regulators, or courts inquire about specific decisions or actions taken based on AI outputs, organizations must be able to provide clear evidence of what transpired. This requires robust record-keeping practices that can demonstrate not only the accuracy of the AI’s outputs but also the context in which those outputs were generated, including the data inputs and constraints that were in place at the time.

As AI systems become more sophisticated and autonomous, the standard of care required for their governance increases. Smarter systems, while potentially more effective, also raise the stakes for organizations in terms of liability and accountability. Without proper evidentiary controls, organizations risk exposure to legal and regulatory challenges. Internal coherence within AI models does not equate to external accountability, as regulators can only assess the observable outputs and the processes surrounding them. This underscores the importance of implementing comprehensive governance frameworks that ensure AI systems are not only effective but also transparent and accountable.

The integration of AI into record-keeping systems represents a fundamental shift in how organizations must approach governance. As AI systems begin to write back to records, trigger actions, or modify states, the need for change control, immutability, and audit trails becomes critical. Organizations must bridge the gap between forward-looking model design and backward-looking governance to ensure that AI systems are defensible and compliant. This requires a focus on evidence and the ability to reconstruct the decision-making process, rather than relying solely on explainability. As AI continues to evolve, organizations must adapt their governance strategies to address these new challenges and ensure that AI systems are used responsibly and effectively.

Read the original article here