Benchmarking SLMs on Modest Hardware

Benchmarking of SLMs (Statistical Language Models) was conducted using a modest hardware setup, featuring an Intel N97 CPU, 32GB of DDR4 RAM, and a 512GB NVMe drive, running on Debian with llama.cpp for CPU inference. A test suite of five questions was used, with ChatGPT providing results and comments. The usability score was calculated by raising the test score to the fifth power, multiplying by the average tokens per second, and applying a 10% penalty if the model used reasoning. This penalty is based on the premise that a non-reasoning model performing equally well as a reasoning one is considered more efficient. This matters because it highlights the efficiency and performance considerations in evaluating language models on limited hardware.

Benchmarking machine learning models, especially in the context of hardware constraints, is crucial for understanding their performance and usability in real-world applications. The use of an Intel n97 CPU with 32GB of DDR4 RAM and a 512GB NVMe drive provides a baseline for testing these models on more modest systems. This setup reflects a more accessible and cost-effective approach, making it relevant for individuals or small organizations that may not have access to high-end hardware. By compiling llama.cpp specifically for CPU inference on Debian, the focus is on optimizing performance within these constraints, which is essential for maximizing the utility of machine learning models in diverse environments.

Creating a test suite of five questions allows for a standardized method to evaluate the performance of different models. This approach ensures that comparisons are consistent and that the results are meaningful. The use of ChatGPT to measure and comment on these results adds an extra layer of analysis, providing insights into the strengths and weaknesses of each model. This methodology not only highlights the models’ capabilities but also their limitations, giving a comprehensive view of their performance.

The usability score, derived from the test score raised to the fifth power and multiplied by the average tokens per second (t/s), provides a quantitative measure of the model’s efficiency. This formula emphasizes both the quality of the response and the speed at which it is delivered, which are critical factors in evaluating the practical application of machine learning models. The decision to apply a 10% penalty for models that use reasoning is an interesting choice, suggesting that in certain contexts, speed and simplicity might be prioritized over complex reasoning processes. This reflects a real-world consideration where faster, straightforward responses could be more desirable.

Understanding these benchmarking processes is important because it sheds light on how different models can be effectively utilized depending on the available hardware and specific needs. It also underscores the importance of tailoring machine learning models to fit particular constraints and requirements, which is a key aspect of deploying technology in varied settings. By exploring these nuances, one can better appreciate the balance between performance, efficiency, and practicality in the field of machine learning. This knowledge is invaluable for developers, researchers, and decision-makers who aim to leverage machine learning technologies in the most effective way possible.

Read the original article here